• Search for a company
  • The collection dictionary
  • The Collection Guide
  • Judicial recovery rates
  • Legal assistance
  • FAQ
  • Customer access
  • Settling a debt
Legalcity - The specialist in debt collection for small and medium-sized businesses, freelancers and entrepreneurs
  • Debt collection
    • Recovery per unit
    • Unlimited recovery
    • Automated collection
    • Unpaid rent
  • Order to pay
    • Order to pay
    • Order for payment Europe
  • Solvency
  • Mediation
  • News
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • Click to open the search field Click to open the search field Search
  • Menu Menu
  • Link to X
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to LinkedIn
You are here : Home1 / Law and regulations2 / Study: Google is the biggest beneficiary of GDPR

Study: Google is the biggest beneficiary of GDPR

Law and Regulations, Uncategorized, RGPD
GDPR

Thanks to its dominant position on the market, Google, the industry leader, benefits from a positive effect brought about by the implementation of the GDPR. This positive effect is mainly due to an increased concentration in the online advertising market. Although the number of trackers is decreasing overall, a few large operators, such as Google, are receiving even more user data as a result of the implementation.

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which is primarily aimed at protecting personal data within the EU, has been in effect for just over four months now.

What has changed since May 25? What impact has the GDPR had on the tracker landscape and the online advertising market in Europe?

A study by Cliqz and Ghostery answers these questions. Using data from WhoTracks.me, it compares the prevalence of trackers one month before and one month after the introduction of GDPR.

WhoTracks.me is a joint initiative of Cliqz and Ghostery. It provides structured information about tracking technologies, market structure and data sharing on the web and thus creates more transparency. On the WhoTracks.me website, interested parties will find monthly tracking statistics visualized. They are based on the evaluation of nearly 300 million pages and more than half a million websites.

According to this study small advertisers lose - Google wins!

Most trackers collect data for advertising purposes. They want to know as much as possible about a user in order to display personalized ads. The more targeted the ads are to the user's interests, the more successful they are and the more money they generate. The global online advertising market is worth an estimated $270 billion in 2018 and is expected to grow by more than 20% over the next two years. Prior to the introduction of the GDPR, the advertising industry was also concerned about the impact it would have on the advertising market and competition.

A comparison of follower prevalence between April and July reveals a clear picture: particularly small advertising operators have lost considerable reach (which can be used as a proxy for market share).

They lost between 18% and 31%. Facebook suffered a drop of just under 7%. On the other hand, the market leader Google was even able to increase its reach slightly (plus 1%).

 

How is this possible?

There are several possible explanations for this:

  • Google and other large ad tech companies have significant resources dedicated to compliance
  • Reports indicate that Google may have used its dominant position to encourage publishers to reduce the number of trackers on their sites and thus the number of ad technology providers.
  • To avoid penalties, website owners prefer to play it safe and leave out smaller advertisers who may have a harder time proving compliance.

One thing is for sure: Google is indirectly benefiting from the effects of the GDPR, which has led to increased concentration of the online advertising market in Europe, with the majority of advertisers losing market share. Google seems to have taken advantage of the uncertainty surrounding the GDPR to strengthen its leading position in the market. On the other hand, many smaller competitors are gradually losing market share since it came into effect.

Going further:

Article economie.gouv : https://www.economie.gouv.fr/entreprises/reglement-general-sur-protection-des-donnees-rgpd

CNIL Tip: https://www.cnil.fr/fr/rgpd-par-ou-commencer

Article ABC Digital Touch: https://abcdigitaltouch.fr/rgpd-quel-impact-pour-les-donnees/

Our services : https://legalcity.fr/mise-en-conformite-rgpd/

October 15, 2018/0 comments/by The Legalcity Editor
Tags: Cliqz, Ghostery, Google, GPRD, Trackers, WhoTracksMe
Share this publication
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://legalcity.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/shutterstock_552493561.jpg 1653 2479 The Legalcity Editorial Board https://legalcity.fr/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/logo-legalcity-2020-blue-hori-2020-s.png The Legalcity Editor2018-10-15 15:39:212020-03-20 13:54:37Study: Google is the biggest beneficiary of the GDPR
0 answers

Leave a comment

Join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Find out more about how your feedback is processed.

Search Search

Categories

  • arbitration
  • General Meetings
  • lease
  • enforcement clause
  • accounting
  • business creation
  • civil law
  • business law
  • tax law
  • social law
  • accounting expertise
  • administrative formality
  • stock control
  • order for payment
  • Justice
  • tenant
  • housing
  • Act and Regulations
  • mediation
  • Not classified
  • owner
  • QuickBooks
  • amicable collection
  • debt recovery
  • lease cancellation
  • RGPD
  • Solvency
  • Statistics

Contact us

LIVE DIGITAL

113 avenue de la République

13002 Marseille

contact@legalcity.fr

01 75 85 85 16

About us

  • Who we are
  • Recruiting
  • General terms and conditions of sale
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal information

Debt collection

  • Contents
  • Introduction to debt collection
  • Payment reminder
  • Searching for financial information
  • Outsourced debt collection
    • Amicable collection
    • Judicial recovery
  • Tax and accounting treatment of bad debts

Resources

  • Search for a company
  • The collection dictionary
  • The Collection Guide
  • Judicial recovery rates
  • Legal assistance
  • FAQ
  • Customer access
  • Settling a debt

The collection dictionary

  • Amicable collection
  • The payment order procedure 
  • Opposition to an order for payment
  • Court Bailiff
  • The enforcement order
  • The certificate of uncollectibility
  • Article 1408
  • Article 700
  • Seizure of assets
  • Seizure and sale
  • The Commercial Court
  • The lump-sum recovery indemnity of the LME Act
  • Tribunal de proximité (formerly the Tribunal d'instance)
  • Judicial Tribunal

Recent articles

  • Transformez vos créances en Cash avec l’intégration LEGALCITY dans l’outil de relance RECOVR
  • Délais de paiement : un enjeu stratégique pour la trésorerie des entreprises
  • ⚖️ Logiciel, société ou cabinet de recouvrement : ce que tout créancier doit absolument savoir
  • 🚀Simplifiez votre recouvrement grâce à l’intégration Sellsy
  • 🚀 Nouveau module « Litiges & Recouvrements avec LegalCity » intégré à Dolibarr : simplifiez la gestion de vos impayés
2023 © Copyright - legalcity
  • Who we are
  • Recruiting
  • General terms and conditions of sale
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal information
Link to: All about legal notices Link to: All about legal notices Everything you need to know about legal noticesLegal notices Link to: FAQ : Which company form should I choose? LegalCity answers Link to: FAQ : Which company form should I choose? LegalCity answers Company statutesFAQ : Which company statutes should I choose? LegalCity answers you
Scroll up Scroll up Scroll up