• Search for a company
  • The collection dictionary
  • The Collection Guide
  • Judicial recovery rates
  • Legal assistance
  • FAQ
  • Customer access
  • Settling a debt
Legalcity - The specialist in debt collection for small and medium-sized businesses, freelancers and entrepreneurs
  • Debt collection
    • Recovery per unit
    • Unlimited recovery
    • Automated collection
    • Unpaid rent
  • Order to pay
    • Order to pay
    • Order for payment Europe
  • Solvency
  • Mediation
  • News
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • Click to open the search field Click to open the search field Search
  • Menu Menu
  • Link to X
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to LinkedIn
You are here : Home1 / business law2 / A little more than a year after the reform of the pay order procedure...

A little more than a year after the reform of the injunction to pay procedure, Legalcity takes stock for you:

business law, administrative formalities, injunction to pay, laws and regulations, debt collection
order for paymentLegalcity

A little more than a year after the reform of the injunction to pay procedure,

 Legalcity takes stock for you:

Theinjunction to pay allows any individual or legal entity to recover a debt or an unpaid invoice.

The procedure is intended to be quick and efficient, and the legislator's ambition was to make it simpler.

Thus, the code of civil procedure relating to the implementation of the injunction to pay procedure has been modified.

On the motion for an order to pay:

It is the Registry of the competent Court that systematically receives the request from the creditor or his agent (Legalcity) by means of a request that specifies the amount of the principal, but also a certain number of additional sums such as penalty clauses, accessory costs and requests for Article 700 in an exhaustive and detailed breakdown of the various elements of the claim

The new article 1407 of the Code of Civil Procedure specifies that the request must be accompanied by a list of supporting documents and a copy of the documents supporting the request.

Before the reform, the order issued by the Court did not show the executory formula.

Once the deadlines had been met, it was necessary to apply to the Court for the enforcement of the said order.

Article 1410 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been amended accordingly.

Service of the Enforceable Order:

After the reform of the order for payment procedure, a certified copy of the order for payment together with the list of supporting documents is sent to each debtor.

All the documents are made available in a dematerialized way by the firm.

It notifies the debtor(s) who can connect to a dedicated safe.

In the event that the Justice Commissioner is unable to do so, article 1411 of the amended Code of Civil Procedure allows him to attach all the documents with the copy of the petition when serving the enforcement order.

Thus, article 1413 of the Code of Civil Procedure confirms that the time limits for opposition and the Court before which it is filed must be clearly indicated in the notification.

The formalism of the opposition remains unchanged and the reform does not bring any change.

An important point and clarification brought by the rewording ofarticle 1422 of the Code of Civil Procedure:

"No matter how service is effected, the time limit for opposition provided for in the first paragraph of article 1416 suspends execution. An objection filed within this period is also suspensive. The order shall not constitute an enforceable title and shall not produce the effects of such a title or of a court decision until the causes of suspensory effect provided for in the first paragraph have expired. It then produces all the effects of a contradictory judgment. It may not be appealed even if it grants delays in payment.

This is indeed normal, because if the order is correctly served with the executory formula, the opposition prevails and allows to suspend the execution by the Commissioner of Justice. The order thus becomes enforceable only after the time limit for appeal has expired!

It is thus imperative to have a Certificate of No Objection from the Court in order to execute!

LEGALCITY's comments on the new injunction to pay procedure and feedback:

Since March 2022, we have noticed a deterioration in processing times by the Court Clerks' Offices, but this deterioration is not homogeneous according to the Clerks' Offices.

Where we get an order in less than 15 days, we get it in almost 4 months depending on the jurisdiction.

The reform was intended to speed up the implementation of the order for payment procedure.

First effect for the procedure:

The time saved by not asking the Court to affix the executory formula on the order is lost by the need to obtain from the same Court a CNO (Certificate of No Opposition)

The second effect is "commercial" for the Bailiffs!

Thus, before the reform, it was necessary to serve a second time the order with the executory formula! The reform now allows the first service to do so.

The Judicial Commissioners have adapted and since they cannot serve the document a second time and in order to compensate for the loss of fees that this induces, following the reform, have found a solution.

Therefore, they charge the creditor for applying for and obtaining the CNO from the Court.

Some even dare to ask for 51 Euros for a procedure that costs only 4 Euros to the clerks!

Legalcity Collection Agency offers its clients the CNO (Certificate of Non Objection)

Thus, in 2023, Legalcity is the platform that allows you to manage your order for payment procedure 100% online.

That is why you should entrust the collection of your unpaid debts to a firm rated 5 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ on Trustpilot.

You benefit from the professional support of a specialized lawyer at low cost.

April 2, 2023/0 comments/by The Legalcity Editor
Tags: injonction de payer, legalcity injonction de payer 2023
Share this publication
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://legalcity.fr/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/injonction-de-payer-2023-legalcity.jpg 728 1835 The Legalcity Editorial Board https://legalcity.fr/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/logo-legalcity-2020-blue-hori-2020-s.png The Legalcity Editor2023-04-02 21:26:152023-04-02 21:30:23A little more than a year after the reform of the injunction to pay procedure, Legalcity takes stock for you:
You may also like
Mandatory or optional representation by a lawyer in the event of a payment order Representation by a lawyer in payment injunction proceedings: optional or compulsory?
application for an order for payment The application for an order for payment
LEGALCITY payment facilitiesLEGALCITY Payment terms: what does the law say?
The principle of compulsory representation by a lawyer and the injunction to pay procedure
Seizure and sale procedure The seizure-sale procedure after the order to pay at LEGALCITY!
order for paymentLegalcity The advantages of the order for payment
0 answers

Leave a comment

Join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Find out more about how your feedback is processed.

Search Search

Categories

  • arbitration
  • General Meetings
  • lease
  • enforcement clause
  • accounting
  • business creation
  • civil law
  • business law
  • tax law
  • social law
  • accounting expertise
  • administrative formality
  • stock control
  • order for payment
  • Justice
  • tenant
  • housing
  • Act and Regulations
  • mediation
  • Not classified
  • owner
  • QuickBooks
  • amicable collection
  • debt recovery
  • lease cancellation
  • RGPD
  • Solvency
  • Statistics

Contact us

LIVE DIGITAL

113 avenue de la République

13002 Marseille

contact@legalcity.fr

01 75 85 85 16

About us

  • Who we are
  • Recruiting
  • General terms and conditions of sale
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal information

Debt collection

  • Contents
  • Introduction to debt collection
  • Payment reminder
  • Searching for financial information
  • Outsourced debt collection
    • Amicable collection
    • Judicial recovery
  • Tax and accounting treatment of bad debts

Resources

  • Search for a company
  • The collection dictionary
  • The Collection Guide
  • Judicial recovery rates
  • Legal assistance
  • FAQ
  • Customer access
  • Settling a debt

The collection dictionary

  • Amicable collection
  • The payment order procedure 
  • Opposition to an order for payment
  • Court Bailiff
  • The enforcement order
  • The certificate of uncollectibility
  • Article 1408
  • Article 700
  • Seizure of assets
  • Seizure and sale
  • The Commercial Court
  • The lump-sum recovery indemnity of the LME Act
  • Tribunal de proximité (formerly the Tribunal d'instance)
  • Judicial Tribunal

Recent articles

  • Transformez vos créances en Cash avec l’intégration LEGALCITY dans l’outil de relance RECOVR
  • Délais de paiement : un enjeu stratégique pour la trésorerie des entreprises
  • ⚖️ Logiciel, société ou cabinet de recouvrement : ce que tout créancier doit absolument savoir
  • 🚀Simplifiez votre recouvrement grâce à l’intégration Sellsy
  • 🚀 Nouveau module « Litiges & Recouvrements avec LegalCity » intégré à Dolibarr : simplifiez la gestion de vos impayés
2023 © Copyright - legalcity
  • Who we are
  • Recruiting
  • General terms and conditions of sale
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal information
Link to: Effectiveness of the DGCCRF's "Name & Shame" scheme Link to: Effectiveness of the DGCCRF's "Name & Shame" scheme Effectiveness of the DGCCRF's "Name & ShameThe effectiveness of "Name and Shame" by the DGCCRF Link to: Cash flow problems: How can debt collection help you effectively? Link to: Cash flow problems: How can debt collection help you effectively? legalcity collectionCash flow problems: How debt collection can help you...
Scroll up Scroll up Scroll up